- Fill in the details in the computation of the fundamental group of the projective
plane, Klein's bottle and the torus done in the lecture by providing a careful proof of
equations (26.8), (26.10) and (26.11).
Hint: Use polar coordinates. Continuously shrink the path
to the point
.
- Show that the fundamental group of the wedge of
copies of
is the free group on
generators.
Calculate the fundamental
group of the truncated grid

or
- Determine the generators of double torus by expressing it as a union of open sets each of which is a
torus from which a tiny closed disc has been removed.
- Let
be the union of the two unlinked circles
in
. Show that
is the free group on two generators.
- Calculate the fundamental groups of the following spaces
- (i)
-
minus a line.
- (ii)
-
minus a two dimensional linear subspace.
- (iii)
-
minus two parallel lines.
- (iv)
-
minus two intersecting lines.
- (v)
-
minus the coordinate axes
- (vi)
-
- (vii)
-
minus finitely many points.
in
Lecture - XXVII (Test IV)
in
- Use the Seifert Van Kampen theorem to compute the fundamental group of the double torus.
- Let
be a compact subset of
and regard
as the one point compactification of
.
Show that
.
- If
is the circle in
given by the pair of equations
show that
. Let
be the circle given by
Show that
. Hint: Use stereographic projection.
- Show that the complement of a line in
is simply connected.
- Calculate the fundamental group of
.
in
Lecture - XXVIII Introductory remarks on homology theory
in
In the first part of the course we focused on the fundamental group and its basic properties.
We discussed an elegant solution of the lifting problem for covering projections in terms of the fundamental group.
While the theory of
fundamental groups and covering spaces is fairly adequate for many applications in low dimensional geometry
and other parts of mathematics such as the theory of function of one complex variable, it is quite ineffective
when higher dimensional objects are involved. For instance the ball
and the sphere
both have trivial
fundamental group (
) which renders it useless
for proving the higher dimensional analogues of the Brouwer's fixed point theorem.
Homology theory provides a functor that is quite convenient for understanding the
geometry of ``higher dimensional objects'' which has the added advantage
of being easily computable (at least for a large class of interesting spaces). While the fundamental group functor
respect
products, the homology groups of
are not so easily described in terms of the homology groups of
and
.
A covering projection is a very special case of a fiber bundle with discrete fibers. We have seen that in the case of
a covering projection
we have a relationship between
and
The story is decidedly more complicated with homology groups. For instance
some work is required to compute the homology groups of the real projective spaces
.
Homotopy theory is better suited for studying fibrations where the use of homology would entail
the formidable machinery of ``spectral sequences''. However, on the computational side there is a very useful
substitute for the Seifert Van Kampen theorem in homology known as the Mayer Vietoris sequence. We shall use it
to calculate efficiently the homology groups of a large number of spaces.
There are several approaches to the homology theory, the oldest being the simplicial theory.
Homology theory evolved over several decades through the early
part of the twentieth century becoming progressively abstract.
The theory we discuss in this course is known as the singular homology theory and would appear somewhat non-intuitive in
the beginning but we hope that the examples and applications presented would enable the students to digest the material.
Singular homology theory appeared rather late in the development of algebraic topology and is a
culmination of efforts spanning a few decades by several eminent topologists. In the intervening years several
seemingly different homology theories developed the oldest and most intuitive being simplicial homology theory that
applies to the restricted class of simplicial complexes. However the topological invariance is highly non-trivial
and beset with technical complications.
Subsections
nisha
2012-03-20