Proof:

We must first show that displayed formula (29.18) gives a well-defined map since several choices are being made. First, for $ k_n \in Z_n(K)$ surjectivity of $ g_n$ shows that there exists $ x_n \in G_n$ such that $ g_n(x_n) = k_n$. Applying the boundary map $ \partial _n$ we see that $ g_{n-1}(\partial x_n) = \partial k_n = 0$ which, by virtue of exactness of (29.16) and injectivity of $ f_{n-1}$, shows there is a unique $ y_{n-1} \in L_{n-1}$ such that

$\displaystyle f_{n-1}(y_{n-1}) = \partial x_n. \eqno(29.19)
$

We have to now show that $ y_{n-1}$ is a cycle in $ L$. This is clear if $ n = 1$ and so we assume $ n\geq 2$. Applying the boundary map to (29.19) gives $ f_{n-2}(\partial y_{n-1}) = 0$ from which we conclude, since $ f_{n-2}$ is injective, that $ y_{n-1}\in Z_{n-1}(L)$. Hence the assignment

$\displaystyle k_n\mapsto \overline{y_{n-1}},\quad k_n \in Z_n(K) \eqno(29.20)
$

is well defined once we show that it is independent of the choice of $ x_n \in g_n^{-1}(k_n)$.

Second, we suppose that for a given $ k_n \in Z_n(K)$, $ x_n^{\prime}$ and $ x_n^{\prime\prime}$ are two members of $ g_n^{-1}(k_n)$ then

$\displaystyle x_n^{\prime} - x_n^{\prime\prime}\in$   ker$\displaystyle \;g_n =$   im$\displaystyle \;f_n.
$

So there is a $ u_n\in L_n$ such that $ x_n^{\prime} - x_n^{\prime\prime} = f_n(u_n)$. On the other hand, for these two choices there exist $ y_{n-1}^{\prime}$ and $ y_{n-1}^{\prime\prime}$ in $ L_{n-1}$ such that (29.19) holds and so

$\displaystyle f_{n-1}(y_{n-1}^{\prime}) - f_{n-1}(y_{n-1}^{\prime\prime}) = \pa...
...n^{\prime} - x_n^{\prime\prime})
= \partial f_n(u_n) = f_{n-1}(\partial u_n).
$

Injectivity of $ f_{n-1}$ implies $ y_{n-1}^{\prime}$ and $ y_{n-1}^{\prime\prime}$ differ by a boundary and so define the same homology class.

Third, we must show that the same homology class results if we begin with two homologous cycles $ k_n^{\prime}$ and $ k_n^{\prime\prime}$. In this there exists $ v_{n+1} \in K_{n+1}$ and $ x_{n+1}\in G_{n+1}$ such that

$\displaystyle k_n^{\prime} - k_n^{\prime\prime} = \partial v_{n+1} = \partial g_{n+1}(x_{n+1}) = g_n(\partial x_{n+1}).
$

Let $ x_n^{\prime}$ and $ x_n^{\prime\prime}$ be chosen from $ g_n^{-1}(k_n^{\prime})$ and $ g_n^{-1}(k_n^{\prime\prime})$ respectively so that $ g_n(x_n^{\prime} - x_n^{\prime\prime} - \partial x_{n+1}) = 0.$ By exactness of (29.16) there is a $ w_n\in L_n$ such that $ x_n^{\prime} - x_n^{\prime\prime} - \partial x_{n+1} = f_n(w_n).$ Applying $ \partial $ to this and and recalling (29.19) we see that the corresponding cycles $ y_{n-1}^{\prime}$ and $ y_{n-1}^{\prime\prime}$ satisfy

$\displaystyle f_{n-1}(y_{n-1}^{\prime} - y_{n-1}^{\prime\prime}) = \partial f_n(w_n) = f_{n-1}(\partial w_n).
$

Since $ f_{n-1}$ is injective we see that the cycles $ y_{n-1}^{\prime}$ and $ y_{n-1}^{\prime\prime}$ are homologous.
nisha 2012-03-20