Module 7 : Traffic Signal Design
Lecture 35 : Signalized Intersection Delay Models
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
 

Random Delay Model

The uniform delay model assumes that arrivals are uniform and that no signal phases fail (i.e., that arrival flow is less than capacity during every signal cycle of the analysis period). At isolated intersections, vehicle arrivals are more likely to be random. A number of stochastic models have been developed for this case, including those by Newell, Miller and Webster. These models generally assume that arrivals are Poisson distributed, with an underlying average rate of v vehicles per unit time. The models account for random arrivals and the fact that some individual cycles within a demand period with $ v/c < 1.0$ could fail due to this randomness. This additional delay is often referred to as Random delay. The most frequently used model for random delay is Webster's formulation:

$\displaystyle RD=\frac{X^2}{2~v~(1-X)}$ (1)

where, RD is the average random delay per vehicle, s/veh, and X is the degree of saturation (v/c ratio). Webster found that the above delay formula overestimate delay and hence he proposed that total delay is the sum of uniform delay and random delay multiplied by a constant for agreement with field observed values. Accordingly, the total delay is given as:

$\displaystyle D=0.90~(UD+RD)$ (2)

Overflow delay model

Model is explained based on the assumption that arrival function is uniform. In this model a new term called over saturation is used to describe the extended time periods during which arrival vehicles exceeds the capacity of the intersection approach to the discharged vehicles. In such cases queue grows and there will be overflow delay in addition to the uniform delay. Fig. 1 illustrates a time period for which $ v/c>1.0$.
Figure 1: Illustration of overflow delay model
\begin{figure}
\centerline{\epsfig{file=qfWebstersOverflow.eps,width=8 cm}}
\end{figure}
During the period of over-saturation delay consists of both uniform delay (in the triangles between the capacity and departure curves) and overflow delay (in the triangle between arrival and capacity curves). As the maximum value of X is 1.0 for uniform delay, it can be simplified as,
$\displaystyle UD$ $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle \frac{C}{2}\frac{(1-\frac{g}{C})^2}{(1-\frac{g}{C}X)}$  
  $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle \frac{C}{2}\left(1-\frac{g}{C}\right)$ (3)

From Fig. 2 total overflow delay can be estimated as,
Figure 2: Derivation of the overflow delay model
\begin{figure}
\centerline{\epsfig{file=qfDerivationOverflow.eps,width=8 cm}}
\end{figure}

$\displaystyle TOD = \frac{1}{2}T(vT-cT) = \frac{T^2}{2}(v-c)$ (4)

where, TOD is the total or aggregate overflow delay (in veh-secs), and T is the analysis period in seconds. Average delay is obtained by dividing the aggregate delay by the number of vehicles discharged with in the time T which is cT.

$\displaystyle OD = \frac{T}{2}\left(\frac{v}{c}-1\right)$ (5)

The delay includes only the delay accrued by vehicles through time T, and excludes additional delay that vehicles still stuck in the queue will experience after time T. The above said delay equation is time dependent i.e., the longer the period of over-saturation exists, the larger delay becomes. A model for average overflow delay during a time period T1 through T2 may be developed, as illustrated in Fig. 3 Note that the delay area formed is a trapezoid, not a triangle. The resulting model for average delay per vehicle during the time period T1 through T2 is:

$\displaystyle OD = \frac{T_1+T_2}{2}\left(\frac{v}{c}-1\right)$ (6)

Figure 3: Overflow delay between time T1 & T2
\begin{figure}
\centerline{\epsfig{file=qfOverflowDelayT1T2.eps,width=8 cm}}
\end{figure}
Formulation predicts the average delay per vehicle that occurs during the specified interval, $ T_1$ through $ T_2$. Thus, delays to vehicles arriving before time $ T_1$ but discharging after $ T_1$ are included only to the extent of their delay within the specified times, not any delay they may have experienced in queue before $ T_1$. Similarly, vehicles discharging after $ T_2$ are not included in the formulation.

Numerical Example

Consider the following situation: An intersection approach has an approach flow rate of 1,900 vph, a saturation flow rate of 2,800 vphg, a cycle length of 90s, and effective green ratio for the approach 0.55. What average delay per vehicle is expected under these conditions?

Solution:

To begin, the capacity and v/c ratio for the intersection approach must be computed. This will determine what model(s) are most appropriate for application in this case: Given, s=2800 vphg, g/C=0.55, and v =1900 vph.
$\displaystyle c$ $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle s\times g/C$  
  $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle 2800\times0.55=1540~\mathrm{vph}$  
$\displaystyle v/c$ $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle 1900/1540=1.23.$  

Since v/c is greater than 1.15 for which the overflow delay model is good so it can be used to find the delay.
$\displaystyle \mathrm{D}$ $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle \mathrm{UD+OD}$  
$\displaystyle UD$ $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle \frac{C}{2}\left(1-\frac{g}{C}\right)$  
  $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle 0.5\times 90[1-0.55]$  
  $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle 20.3$  
$\displaystyle OD$ $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle \frac{T}{2}\left(\frac{v}{c}-1\right)$  
  $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle \frac{3600}{2}(1.23-1)$  
  $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle 414$  
$\displaystyle D$ $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle 20.3+414$  
  $\displaystyle =$ $\displaystyle 434.3~\mathrm{sec/veh}$  

This is a very large value but represents an average over one full hour period.