|
The first step is given in Table 1
Table 1:
Step1: Computation of parameter
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
1 |
1.0 |
102 |
1.0 |
102.00 |
|
|
| 1 |
2 |
1.0 |
118 |
0.69 |
81.42 |
216.28 |
0.00462 |
| |
3 |
1.0 |
106 |
0.31 |
32.86 |
|
|
| |
1 |
1.0 |
102 |
0.69 |
70.38 |
|
|
| 2 |
2 |
1.0 |
118 |
1.0 |
118 |
235.02 |
0.00425 |
| |
3 |
1.0 |
106 |
0.44 |
46.64 |
|
|
| |
1 |
1.0 |
102 |
0.31 |
31.62 |
|
|
| 3 |
2 |
1.0 |
118 |
0.44 |
51.92 |
189.54 |
0.00527 |
| |
3 |
1.0 |
106 |
1.00 |
106 |
|
|
The second step is to find .
This can be found out as
, where is
obtained from the previous step.
The detailed computation is given in Table 2.
Table 2:
Step2: Computation of parameter
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| |
1 |
0.00462 |
98 |
1.0 |
0.4523 |
|
|
| 1 |
2 |
0.00425 |
106 |
0.694 |
0.3117 |
0.9618 |
1.0397 |
| |
3 |
0.00527 |
122 |
0.308 |
0.1978 |
|
|
| |
1 |
0.00462 |
98 |
0.69 |
0.3124 |
|
|
| 2 |
2 |
0.00425 |
106 |
1.0 |
0.4505 |
1.0458 |
0.9562 |
| |
3 |
0.00527 |
122 |
0.44 |
0.2829 |
|
|
| |
1 |
0.00462 |
98 |
0.31 |
0.1404 |
|
|
| 3 |
2 |
0.00425 |
106 |
0.44 |
0.1982 |
0.9815 |
1.0188 |
| |
3 |
0.00527 |
122 |
1.00 |
0.6429 |
|
|
The function can be written in the matrix form as:
![\begin{displaymath}
\left[ \begin{array}{ccc} 1.0&0.69&0.31 \\
0.69&1.0&0.44 \\
0.31&0.44&1.0 \\
\end{array} \right]
\end{displaymath}](img14.gif) |
(1) |
Then can be computed using the formula
 |
(2) |
For eg,
.
is the actual productions from the zone and is the computed ones.
Similar is the case with attractions also. The results are shown in table 3.
Table 3:
Step3: Final Table
| |
1 |
2 |
3 |
 |
 |
 |
| 1 |
48.01 |
35.24 |
15.157 |
0.00462 |
98 |
98.407 |
| 2 |
32.96 |
50.83 |
21.40 |
0.00425 |
106 |
105.19 |
| 3 |
21.14 |
31.919 |
69.43 |
0.00527 |
122 |
122.489 |
 |
1.0397 |
0.9562 |
1.0188 |
|
|
|
 |
102 |
118 |
106 |
|
|
|
 |
102.11 |
117.989 |
105.987 |
|
|
|
is the actual productions from the zone and is the computed ones.
Similar is the case with attractions also.
Therefore error can be computed as ;
|