The above lemma is immediate from the definition of Laplace transform and the linearity of the definite integral.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
where
The next theorem relates the Laplace transform of the function
with that of
.
So, by definition,
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
We can extend the above result for
derivative of
a function
, if
exist and
is continuous for
. In this case, a repeated
use of Theorem 10.3.5, gives the following corollary.
Now, using Theorem 10.3.5, we get
Suppose we know the Laplace transform of a
and
we wish to find the Laplace transform of the function
Suppose that
exists. Then writing
gives
Thus,
Hence,we have the following corollary.
By lemma 10.3.9, we know that
Suppose
Then
Therefore,
Thus we get
We don't go into the details of the proof of the change in the order of integration. We assume that the order of the integrations can be changed and therefore
Thus,
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Hence,