The incoherent planar boundary that separates a precipitate and matrix thickens
as
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
With increasing undercooling, the growth velocity of a precipitate-matrix interface
(a)
increases and hence peaks at highest undercooling
(b)
decreases and hence peaks at lowest undercooling
(c)
increases and then decreases and hence peaks at intermediate undercooling
(d)
decreases and then increases and hence peaks at both highest and lowest udercoolings
The growth rate of an incoherent, planar precipitate-matrix interface is proportional
to
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
In general,
(a)
the mobilities of coherent and incoherent boundaries are the same
(b)
the mobility of coherent boundary is lower than that of incoherent boundary
(c)
the mobility of incoherent boundary is lower than that of coherent boundary
Derive Eq. 56 from Eq. 55 by integration, and
Eq. 57 from Eq. 56 by differentiation.
Consider the phase diagram shown in Fig. 29.
Let T1, T2 and T3 be 1000, 650 and 600 K, respectively.
Consider two pieces of an alloy of composition 0.25; let one be cooled from
T1 to T2 and kept at T2 for about 2 minutes while the other is cooled
from T1 to T3 and kept at T3 for about 2 minutes.
Assuming incoherent and planar boundary between nuclei and supersaturated
phase, calculate the increase in length of the precipitates in these two cases.
The relevant diffusivity data is as follows:
D = 1.2 x 10m/sec and Q = 150 kJ/mol.
Figure 29:
Schematic phase diagram to show the heat treatment. The overall alloy composition is 0.25. In one case,
the alloy is cooled from T1 to T2 and is kept at T2 for 5 hours. In the other, the alloy is cooled
from T1 to T2 and is kept at T3 for 5 hours.
[scale=0.4]Figures/ProblemPhaseDia.pdf
Consider the growth of two precipitates which are close to each other
as shown in the schematic (Fig. 30).
Can Eq. 57 be used to describe
the growth of these two precipitates? Explain.
Figure 30:
Two precipitates close to each other in a supersaturated matrix
growing with planar, incoherent boundaries.
[scale=0.4]Figures/ProblemDiffFieldOverlap.pdf
Consider the growth of a precipitate nucleated at the grain boundary
of two grains. Explain the growth of such a precipitate assuming that
the solute diffuses substitutionally. Would the growth process be different
if the solute diffuses interstitially?