Module 4: Conceptualizing the relationship between man and society
  Lecture 8: Structure, Symbolic Interactionism and Structural Symbolic Interactionism
 

Models of man

From the sociological point of view man is a social robot or a prisoner of society. His priorities, preferences, values, standards, beliefs, ideas of happy life, ideas of harmonious living, and his behavior are all determined by social structure. He gets them from socialization or process of learning while growing among others. However, there are some other models of man too. To quote Inkeles (2001, 52-53):

In The Lonely Crowd David Riesman presents a different set of social types, one which has probably achieved wider currency than any sociological typology, ever attained. Riesman distinguished three main types, each of which represents a different model of conformity, or of response to social control.

The “tradition-directed” are those whose behavior is minutely controlled from without by traditional cultural standards, by kinship ties, religion, ceremonials, and the like. Their outstanding characteristic is conformity to the external standards of behavior, the etiquette of their community. “Inner-directed” people are responsive not to “strict and self-evident tradition,” but rather to standards “implanted early in life by the elders and directed toward generalization but nonetheless inescapably destined goals.” By contrast, the “other-directed,” the men with a gyroscope inside, are individuals for whom their contemporaries are the source of direction. They follow the crowd.

Riesman called these “historic” types because he feels that each is most characteristic of a given kind of society at a certain stage of development. The tradition-directed man is typical in long settled, unchanging societies where there is a fairly stable ratio of man-to-land, combined with great potential for growth in the unused reserves of the society. In Western history the Middle Ages may be regarded as a period high in tradition-direction.

From Riesman’s perspective a man is certainly a product of society but is a complex product of society. He does not react to outside world in a simple, predictable manner because he has a well developed, well formed structure within himself, although in the final analysis that inner core is also a product of society. You may call this inner core his personality. A relatively stabilized personality determines man’s thought and action exactly in the same way as his biological composition. For sociologists his personality is a unique organization of the various roles a person plays in society.