Mulkay, Michael, J. Potter, and Steven Yearley. 1983. ‘Why an Analysis of Scientific Discourse is Needed' in Karin Knorr Cetina and Michael Mulkay, eds., Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science (pp. 171-203). London: Sage.

Stehr, Nico. 1978. ‘The Ethos of Science Revisited' in J. Gaston, ed., The Sociology of Science: Problems, Approaches and Research (pp. 172-196). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Woolgar, Steve. Knowledge and Reflexivity: New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Sage.

Ziman, John. 1984. An Introduction to Science Studies: The Philosophical and Social Aspects of Science and Technology . Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Zuckerman, Harriet. 1988. ‘The Sociology of Science' in Neil J. Smelser, ed., Handbook of Sociology (pp. 511-574). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Zuckerman, Harriet and Robert K. Merton. 1971. ‘Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalization, Structure and Functions of the Referee System', Minerva , 9:66-100.

Questions

1. Critically examine the counter norms of Mertonian ethos of science.
2. What is the counter norm of universalism?
3. What do you mean by particularism?
4. What is the counter norm of communism?
5. What do you mean by secrecy?
6. What is the counter norm of disinterestedness?
7. What do you mean by self-interestedness?
8. What is the counter norm of organized skepticism?
9. What do you mean by organized dogmatism?
10. Distinguish between externalist and internalist characterization of science.