In this section, we will look at some special classes of square
matrices which  are diagonalisable. We will also be dealing with
matrices having complex entries and hence for a matrix 
 recall the following definitions.
Note that a symmetric matrix is always Hermitian, a skew-symmetric matrix
is always skew-Hermitian and  an orthogonal matrix is always
unitary. Each of these matrices are normal. If 
 is a unitary
matrix then  
EXAMPLE  6.3.2   
- Let 
 Then 
is skew-Hermitian.
 
- Let 
 and 
 Then 
 is a unitary matrix and 
 is a normal
matrix. Note that 
 is also a normal matrix.
 
 
EXERCISE  6.3.4   
- Let 
 be a square matrix such that 
 is a diagonal matrix for some unitary matrix 
.
Prove that 
 is a normal matrix.
 
- Let 
 be any matrix. Then 
 where 
 is the Hermitian part of 
 and
 is the skew-Hermitian part of 
 
- Every matrix can be uniquely expressed as 
 where both 
 and 
 are Hermitian matrices.
 
- Show that 
 is always skew-Hermitian.
 
- Does there exist a unitary matrix 
 such that 
where 
and 
 
 
Proof.
Let 

 be an eigenpair. Then 

 and 

implies
Hence
But 

 is an eigenvector and hence 

 and so the real number

 is non-zero as well. Thus 

 That is, 

 is a real number.
 height6pt width 6pt depth 0pt
 
Proof.
 We will prove the result by induction on the size of
the matrix.  The result is clearly true if 

 Let the result
be true for 

 we will prove the result in case 

So, let 

 be a 

 matrix and let 

 be
an eigenpair of 

 with 

 We now extend the linearly
independent set 

 to form  an orthonormal basis 

 (using 
Gram-Schmidt
Orthogonalisation) of 

.
As 
 is an orthonormal set,
Therefore, observe that for all 
Hence, we also have 

 for 

 Now, define
![$ U_1 = [ {\mathbf x}, \; {\mathbf u}_2, \; \cdots, {\mathbf u}_k ]$](img3023.png)
 (with 

 as  columns of  

). Then the matrix 

 is  a unitary matrix
and 
 
where 

 is a

 matrix.  As  

,we get 

. This condition,
together with the fact that 

 is a real number (use Proposition 
6.3.5), implies that 
 

. That is, 

 is also 
a Hermitian matrix. Therefore, by induction hypothesis there
exists a 

 unitary matrix 

 such that 
Recall that , the entries 

 for 

 are the eigenvalues of the matrix 

 We also know that
two similar matrices have the same set of eigenvalues. Hence,  the
eigenvalues of 

 are 

Define 

 Then  

 is a unitary matrix
and
 Thus, 

 is a diagonal matrix with diagonal entries

 the eigenvalues of 

Hence, the result follows.
height6pt width 6pt depth 0pt
 
COROLLARY  6.3.7   
Let 
 be an 
 real symmetric matrix. Then
- the eigenvalues of 
 are all real,
 
- the corresponding eigenvectors can be chosen to have real entries, and
 
- the eigenvectors also form an orthonormal basis of 
 
 
Proof.
As 

 is symmetric, 

 is also an Hermitian matrix. Hence, by Proposition
6.3.5, the eigenvalues of 

 are all real.
Let 

 be an eigenpair of 

 Suppose 

Then there exist  

 such that 

So, 
Comparing the real and imaginary parts, we get 

 and

 Thus, we can choose the eigenvectors to have real entries.
To prove the orthonormality of the eigenvectors, we proceed on the lines
of the proof of Theorem 6.3.6, Hence, the readers are advised
to complete the proof.
 height6pt width 6pt depth 0pt
 
Remark  6.3.9   
In the previous exercise, we saw  that the matrices
 and 
 are similar but not unitarily equivalent, whereas
unitary equivalence implies similarity equivalence as 
But in numerical calculations, unitary transformations are preferred
as compared to similarity transformations. The main reasons being:
- Exercise 6.3.8.2 implies
that an orthonormal
change of basis leaves unchanged the sum of squares of the
absolute values of the entries which need not be true under a
non-orthonormal change of basis.
 
- As 
 for a unitary matrix 
 unitary equivalence is
computationally simpler.
 
- Also in doing ``conjugate transpose", the loss of accuracy due to round-off
errors doesn't occur.
 
 
We next prove the Schur's Lemma and use it to show that normal matrices
are unitarily diagonalisable.
LEMMA  6.3.10 (Schur's Lemma)    
Every 
 complex matrix is unitarily similar to an upper
triangular matrix. 
Proof.
 We will prove the result by induction on the size of
the matrix.  The result is clearly true if 

 Let the result
be true for 

 we will prove the result in case 

So, let 

 be a 

 matrix and let 

 be
an eigenpair for 

 with 

 Then the linearly
independent set 

 can be extended, using the 
Gram-Schmidt
Orthogonalisation process, to get an orthonormal basis 

 of 

. Then
  
![$ U_1 = [ {\mathbf x}\; {\mathbf u}_2 \; \cdots {\mathbf u}_k ]$](img3081.png)
 (with 

 as the columns of the matrix 

 )
is a unitary matrix and
where 

 is a 

 matrix. By induction
hypothesis there exists a 

 unitary matrix

 such that 

 is an upper triangular matrix
with diagonal entries 

 the eigen
values of the matrix 

 Observe that since the eigenvalues of

 are   

 the
 eigenvalues of 

 are 

Define 

 Then check that 

 is a unitary matrix and

 is an upper triangular matrix with diagonal entries

 the eigenvalues of the
matrix 

 Hence, the result follows.
 height6pt width 6pt depth 0pt
 
We end this chapter with an application of the theory of diagonalisation
to the study of conic sections in analytic geometry and the study of
maxima and minima in analysis.
A K Lal
2007-09-12