Module 3: Velocity Measurement
  Lecture 16: Validation of PIV with HWA
 

Curve Fitting

A number of functions for curve fitting the hotwire calibration data have been proposed in the literature. These functions are individually applied to the two wires of the probe. The most commonly used functions are polynomials, power laws (King's law) and look-up tables. Low order polynomials, say second or third, do not show an oscillatory trend between calibration points. Jorgensen (2002) has shown that for a wide range of velocities power law fits are less accurate than polynomial ts and show a systematic error distribution. The fourth- and fifth-order polynomials are preferable and gives less error, almost of equal accuracy. The reported maximum errors for these polynomials are 0.74 and 0.53% respectively.

For velocity measurements in the lower range, say 0.5 to 4 m/s, a number of special calibration procedures is available. In present investigation, two different approaches were examined, but the difference between them was found to be negligible. These approaches are based on the linearizer function (recommended by DANTEC) and a high order polynomial. In linearizer approach the mathematical relationship used is

(10)

Here A,B,C,D and E are curve fitting parameters. They are selected to give a fluid velocity equal to 10 m/sec for a wire output of 10 V. The quantity y is the output quantity equal to normalized velocity of fluid, defined as

(11)