We begin with the observation that the condition spelled out in (i) is independent of the choice of
and also independent of the choice of
. Well, changing the element
in the fiber would give a conjugate
subgroup but the normality hypothesis
says that the conjugacy class of the subgroup
is a singleton.
Second, a group isomorphism must take a normal subgroup to a normal subgroup and so the condition (i) does not depend on the choice of
the base point
.
Proof that (i) implies (ii). Suppose that
is a normal subgroup of
and
is an arbitrary loop in
based at
. Let
and
be two lifts of
with initial points
such that
a closed loop. Then
which means
is in the stabilizer of
and hence, by (iii) of theorem (17.2),
belongs to the stabilizer of
. Thus
and we see that
is also closed.
Proof that (ii) implies (i). If
is not a normal subgroup of
then it
has at least two distinct conjugates which,
by virtue of theorem (17.2),
must be the stabilizers of say
.
Thus there exists
Stab
but
Stab
. In other words
where
and
are the lifts of
starting at
and
respectively. Thus
the lift
of
is closed whereas the lift
is not closed.
nisha
2012-03-20