Proof:

We begin with the observation that the condition spelled out in (i) is independent of the choice of $ x_0$ and also independent of the choice of $ {\tilde x}_0\in p^{-1}(x_0)$. Well, changing the element $ {\tilde x}_0$ in the fiber would give a conjugate subgroup but the normality hypothesis says that the conjugacy class of the subgroup $ p_*(\pi_1({\tilde X}, {\tilde x}_0))$ is a singleton. Second, a group isomorphism must take a normal subgroup to a normal subgroup and so the condition (i) does not depend on the choice of the base point $ x_0$.

Proof that (i) implies (ii). Suppose that $ p_*(\pi_1({\tilde X}, {\tilde x}_0))$ is a normal subgroup of $ \pi_1(X, x_0)$ and $ \gamma$ is an arbitrary loop in $ X$ based at $ x_0$. Let $ {\tilde \gamma}_1$ and $ {\tilde \gamma}_2$ be two lifts of $ \gamma$ with initial points $ {\tilde x}_1, {\tilde x}_2$ such that $ {\tilde \gamma}_1$ a closed loop. Then

$\displaystyle {\tilde x}_1\cdot[\gamma] = {\tilde x}_1
$

which means $ [\gamma]$ is in the stabilizer of $ {\tilde x}_1$ and hence, by (iii) of theorem (17.2), $ [\gamma]$ belongs to the stabilizer of $ {\tilde x}_2$. Thus

$\displaystyle {\tilde x}_2\cdot [\gamma] = {\tilde \gamma}_2(1) = {\tilde x}_2
$

and we see that $ {\tilde \gamma}_2$ is also closed.

Proof that (ii) implies (i). If $ p_*(\pi_1({\tilde X}, {\tilde x}_0))$ is not a normal subgroup of $ \pi_1(X, x_0)$ then it has at least two distinct conjugates which, by virtue of theorem (17.2), must be the stabilizers of say $ {\tilde x}_1, {\tilde x}_2 \in p^{-1}(x_0)$. Thus there exists $ [\gamma] \in p_*(\pi_1({\tilde X}, {\tilde x}_1)) = \;$Stab $ \;{\tilde x}_1$ but $ [\gamma] \notin p_*(\pi_1({\tilde X}, {\tilde x}_2)) = \;$Stab $ \;{\tilde x}_2$. In other words

$\displaystyle {\tilde x}_1\cdot[\gamma] = {\tilde \gamma}_1(1) = {\tilde x}_1,\quad {\tilde x}_2\cdot [\gamma] = {\tilde \gamma}_2(1) \neq {\tilde x}_2,
$

where $ {\tilde \gamma}_1$ and $ {\tilde \gamma}_2$ are the lifts of $ \gamma$ starting at $ {\tilde x}_1$ and $ {\tilde x}_2$ respectively. Thus the lift $ {\tilde \gamma}_1$ of $ \gamma$ is closed whereas the lift $ {\tilde \gamma}_2$ is not closed.
nisha 2012-03-20