Self Assessment Quiz


Q15. As per carbon cycle about 110 billion ton C/yr (as CO2) is picked from atmosphere by photo synthesis. Of this 50 billion ton Carbon/yr (as CO2)  is returned as respiration flux from 650 billion ton live carbon of land and the balance 60 billion ton Carbon/yr falls on soil as dead organic matter. This dead organic carbon due to soil respiration from typically 100 billion ton live carbon of soil returns to atmosphere as carbon dioxide thus completing the chain. 

Water holds very little life stated as 1-5 billion ton measured as  live carbon; in water algal respiration produces oxygen which is used by all organisms of water. Algal photosynthesis picks up 50 billion tons of carbon/yr from atmosphere and roughly the same amount 50 billion ton carbon/yr returns due respiration. It is now known that up to 40 billion ton carbon /yr additionally circulates due to physical mass transfer (due to temperature differences).

There is no dead organic carbon in water of this planet; yet all the wastes of human activities go into water by and large. But water does not support dead organic carbon — so says Carbon Cycle ?

Fossil combustion produces about 6 billion ton carbon/yr (as CO2) which enters atmosphere. The total carbon in litter respiration of soil is 10 times that in fossil fuels. There is so much energy in wastes. Why then do we not make better use of this energy ?

Nitrogen cycle is relatively less understood. It is now known that human activities release 400 million ton N/yr as oxides into atmosphere mostly due to high temperature combustion processes. In contrast natural N-fixation (N2 + H2O = NH3 + O2) generates 130 million ton – N/yr which is the prime source of N for life on soil. The disturbance to N- cycle seem as large as 300 plus % ; while fossil combustion contributes to about 5 % disturbance to C – cycle. Suggesting that green house problems currently engaging the world community must be understood in new ways so as to solve the problem on hand.

This exercise is about coming to grips with these foundational problems particularly fate of nitrogen through some lab measurements compiled below.

Experiments in a lab soil column are tabulated here. Typically soil columns 20 lit have been used in the experiments. Synthetic substrate containing sodium acetate (carbon source) , ammonium and nitrite – nitrogen (as  N source). In addition some minerals are also used.  Feed is pumped into reactor by peristaltic pumps at rates desired. Experiments have been conducted for different C/N. Inlet and outlet compositions are measured  viz. pH, DO, SS, COD, Nitrite-N (A say), ammonium-N (B say), nitrate-N (C say) . Oxygen supply is as per whatever might be available naturally.


Q15.1. Plot nitrite-N loss versus ammonium-N loss (mg/L reactor/hr) for different C/N. Explain your results


Q15.2 Plot carbon loss versus,
a) total N loss,
b) ammonium-N loss and
c) Nitrite-N loss for different C/N.

Explain your results


Q15.3. Plot nitrate-N loss versus carbon loss for different C/N .Explain your results.

Let’s suppose that losses so observed arise from the following reactions
a) nitrite reduction to ammonia – X1 ,
b) nitrite oxidation to nitrate X2 ,
c) reaction between nitrite-N and ammonium-N  to produce nitrogen gas and water ammonia and oxygen, X3 ,
d) reaction between nitrogen gas and water to give ammonia and oxygen.

In life processes carbon is used as energy source and also fixed as cell mass. Let X4 be cell mass and X5 be Carbon lost measured as COD. It may not be incorrect to assume that ammonia produced X1 is fixed in cell mass so X4 = α*X1 wherein α is the ratio COD of cell mass/N content of cell mass. Note that alpha data is available say for corn is 74.0 etc.


Q15.4 Set up the stoichiometry and determine the number of independent reactions and hence express X1, X2, X3 (mg/L reactor.hr) in terms of known measurements.


Q15.5. Plot X1 versus 2X3 for different C/N and comment


Q15.6 Plot 2X3 versus COD loss and comment


Q15.7 Plot slope (of COD loss/ 2X3) versus C/N and comment


Q15.8 Using results of Q15.7 predict productions from soil say for corn, sugarcane? Compare with available data for Corn (See Socolow 1999, Proc Natl Acad Sciences 96,6001-6008)  and compare your predictions.


Q15.9 Estimate energy for cell synthesis assuming that exergonic reactions (nitrification & aerobic respiration) provide energy for endergonic reactions (protein synthesis & cell synthesis).

Table 7.12 Carbon and Nitrogen removal studies in 20 L CSF system

RUN

Flow Rate

C/N

COD (mg/L)

NH4+-N (mg/L)

NO2--N (mg/L)

NO3--N  (mg/L)

 

 

 

 

 

(L/hr)

 

Inf

Eff

Inf

Eff

Inf

Eff

Inf

Eff

1

3

1.86

200

55.4

18.3

0.6

21.7

0.08

0

21.3

2

3

1.86

500

182.7

46.1

7.4

53.8

0.1

0

6.1

3

3

1.86

1000

385.5

90.4

15.4

107.5

0.02

0

1.1

4

3

3.32

200

77.5

10.1

0.4

12

0.09

0

8.7

5

3

3.32

500

230.1

25.9

4.5

29.9

0.15

0

5.6

6

3

3.32

1000

435.5

51.1

6.3

59.8

0.7

0

2.7

7

3

5.4

200

120.1

6.5

1.9

7.5

1.7

0

4.1

8

3

5.4

500

239.6

16

0.9

18.2

0.08

0

3

9

3

5.4

1000

505.6

31.1

2.4

36.8

0.7

0

1.7

10

6

1.86

200

78.2

18.3

3.4

21.7

0.3

0

13.7

11

6

1.86

500

207

46.1

10.3

53.8

2.3

0

5.6

12

6

1.86

1000

391.3

90.4

16.1

107.5

0.5

0

2.7

13

6

3.32

200

95.9

10.1

1.8

12

0.2

0

7

14

6

3.32

500

246.3

25.9

5.8

29.9

1.1

0

4.3

15

6

3.32

1000

482.7

51.1

10

59.8

1.1

0

2

16

6

5.4

200

142.5

6.5

3.2

7.5

3.3

0

5.4

17

6

5.4

500

285.2

16

3.5

18.2

2.5

0

3.3

18

6

5.4

1000

539.9

31.1

4.4

36.8

3.2

0

0.9

19

12

1.86

200

93.5

18.3

5.3

21.7

3

0

7.1

20

12

1.86

500

210.2

46.1

10.7

53.8

2.9

0

5.7

21

12

1.86

1000

400.7

90.4

17.2

107.5

2.2

0

4.1

22

12

3.32

200

131.8

10.1

4.7

12

4.3

0

3.9

23

12

3.32

500

272.4

25.9

7.8

29.9

4.1

0

3.1

24

12

3.32

1000

480.9

51.1

9.9

59.8

0.9

0

2.3

25

12

5.4

200

144.3

6.5

3.3

7.5

3.4

0

3

26

12

5.4

500

299.3

16

4.4

18.2

3.6

0

2.1

27

12

5.4

1000

600

31.1

7.9

36.8

7.6

0

0.2

28

3

0.93

200

48

35

10

41.20

0.3

0

25.6

29

3

0.93

500

172.8

87.5

15

103.3

0.56

0

8.6

30

3

0.93

1000

345.5

175

32.5

204.70

0.68

0

3.1

31

6

0.93

200

67.3

35

12.5

41.20

0.65

0

17.8

32

6

0.93

500

193.5

87.5

18.5

103.3

0.73

0

6.9

33

6

0.93

1000

362.7

175

34.1

204.70

0.96

0

2.6

34

12

0.93

200

79.6

35

14.2

41.20

4.3

0

11.2

35

12

0.93

500

197.4

87.5

19.7

103.3

4.6

0

5.8

36

12

0.93

1000

374.8

175

35.3

204.70

5.2

0

2.3

37

3

7.5

200

128

5.6

1.5

6.5

0.8

0

3.9

38

3

7.5

500

243

13.8

2.1

16.1

2.1

0

2.9

39

3

7.5

1000

527

26.6

2.7

30.3

3.4

0

1.6

40

6

7.5

200

149

5.6

3.1

6.5

1.45

0

3.4

41

6

7.5

500

301

13.8

3.6

16.1

3.3

0

2.5

42

6

7.5

1000

554

26.6

4.2

30.3

3.9

0

1.4

43

12

7.5

200

154

5.6

3.4

6.5

1.8

0

3.1

44

12

7.5

500

315

13.8

4.3

16.1

3.75

0

2.2

45

12

7.5

1000

616

26.6

7.2

30.3

6.6

0

1.1

46

3

10.8

200

138

4.5

0.7

4.85

0.85

0

3.8

47

3

10.8

500

253

12.4

6.1

13.5

2.54

0

2.8

48

3

10.8

1000

555

21.2

8.7

28.8

4.2

0

1.5

49

6

10.8

200

164

4.5

1.5

4.85

1.6

0

3.2

50

6

10.8

500

315

12.4

7.3

13.5

3.85

0

2.2

51

6

10.8

1000

579

21.2

9.6

28.8

4.95

0

1.2

52

12

10.8

200

168

4.5

3.1

4.85

1.92

0

2.9

53

12

10.8

500

332

12.4

8.2

13.5

4.77

0

2.0

54

12

10.8

1000

631

21.2

10.4

28.8

7.35

0

1.0

Table7.12 Carbon and nitrogen production & removal studies in 20 L CSF reactor

RUN

Flow Rate

(l hr-1)

C/N

pH

EC

(μS cm-1)

TDS

(mg l-1)

DO

(mg l-1)

Turbidity

(mg l-1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inf

Eff

Inf

Eff

Inf

Eff

Inf

Eff

Inf

Eff

1

3

1.86

7.1

7.7

872

812

887

821

4.2

4.8

6.8

0.6

2

3

1.86

7.2

7.8

874

814

889

815

4.3

5.1

7.2

0.8

3

3

1.86

7.1

7.9

875

810

890

818

4.4

5.2

6.7

0.6

4

3

3.32

6.9

7.4

966

890

980

845

4.6

5.1

6.5

0.5

5

3

3.32

6.8

7.2

967

891

982

848

4.7

5.2

6.7

0.6

6

3

3.32

6.8

7.2

969

892

985

847

4.8

5.1

6.4

0.5

7

3

5.4

6.5

8.2

973

895

995

856

4.9

5.5

6.6

0.5

8

3

5.4

6.4

8.2

974

894

998

855

4.8

5.3

6.7

0.6

9

3

5.4

6.5

8.1

971

891

992

852

5.1

5.6

6.7

0.6

10

6

1.86

7.2

7.8

871

809

887

720

4.4

5.2

6.8

0.8

11

6

1.86

7.1

7.9

873

808

889

716

4.3

5.2

7.2

0.9

12

6

1.86

7.2

7.9

874

811

890

717

4.4

5.3

6.7

0.8

13

6

3.32

7.1

7.3

965

885

980

730

4.8

5.3

6.5

0.7

14

6

3.32

6.9

7.5

968

887

982

732

4.7

5.1

6.7

0.8

15

6

3.32

6.9

7.8

968

890

985

734

4.8

5.2

6.4

0.8

16

6

5.4

6.6

8.1

973

893

995

728

4.9

5.4

6.6

0.8

17

6

5.4

6.5

8.2

975

896

998

730

4.8

5.3

6.7

0.9

18

6

5.4

6.4

8.4

970

889

992

731

5.1

5.6

6.7

0.9

19

12

1.86

7.2

7.8

870

805

887

740

4.1

4.9

6.8

1.1

20

12

1.86

7.1

7.8

872

810

889

745

4.3

5.1

7.2

1.1

21

12

1.86

7.2

7.8

873

812

890

742

4.3

5.2

6.7

0.9

22

12

3.32

7.1

7.6

965

884

980

760

4.6

5.2

6.5

0.9

23

12

3.32

6.9

7.5

966

886

982

762

4.8

5.1

6.7

0.9

24

12

3.32

6.9

7.4

968

890

985

763

4.8

5.4

6.4

0.9

25

12

5.4

6.7

7.9

972

892

995

765

4.9

5.4

6.6

1.1

26

12

5.4

6.6

8.1

975

895

998

764

4.9

5.6

6.7

0.9

27

12

5.4

6.8

8.3

970

890

992

765

5.1

5.7

6.7

1.1

Note: Inf: Influent; Eff: Effluent 20 L CSF reactor made up of aluminium contains media typically partially weathered Deccan trap basalt, under drain and distributor for the wastewater. The influent and effluent samples were analysed at regular interval.

Table7.12 Carbon and nitrogen production & removal studies in 20 L CSF reactor

RUN

Flow Rate

(l hr-1 )

C/N

pH

EC

(μS cm-1)

TDS

(mg l-1)

DO

(mg l-1)

Turbidity

(mg l-1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inf

Eff

Inf

Eff

Inf

Eff

Inf

Eff

Inf

Eff

28

3

0.93

7.2

7.5

672

712

687

722

4.3

4.7

6.5

0.5

29

3

0.93

7.3

7.6

674

714

689

717

4.4

5.0

7.0

0.7

30

3

0.93

7.2

7.5

675

710

690

719

4.5

5.3

6.5

0.5

31

3

0.93

6.8

7.2

766

790

780

825

4.6

5.2

6.6

0.5

32

3

0.93

6.7

7.1

767

791

782

828

4.8

5.4

6.6

0.7

33

3

0.93

6.7

7.2

769

792

785

830

4.7

5.2

6.5

0.6

34

3

0.93

6.4

7.5

773

795

795

836

4.9

5.5

6.4

0.4

35

3

0.93

6.3

7.6

774

794

798

838

4.7

5.4

6.6

0.4

36

3

0.93

6.4

7.7

771

791

792

842

5.1

5.7

6.8

0.4

37

6

7.5

7.1

7.8

771

709

787

720

4.5

5.3

6.9

0.6

38

6

7.5

7.2

7.7

773

708

789

718

4.4

5.4

7.4

0.7

39

6

7.5

7.1

7.8

774

711

790

719

4.6

5.4

6.6

0.6

40

6

7.5

7.2

7.5

765

785

780

790

4.7

5.4

6.6

0.4

41

6

7.5

6.8

7.3

768

787

782

792

4.6

5.3

6.8

0.6

42

6

7.5

6.7

7.6

768

790

785

794

4.7

5.4

6.6

0.

43

6

7.5

6.5

7.1

773

793

795

800

4.8

5.5

6.4

0.8

44

6

7.5

6.4

7.4

775

796

798

802

4.9

5.5

6.8

0.7

45

6

7.5

6.3

7.3

770

789

792

791

5.2

5.8

6.8

0.8

46

12

10.8

7.1

7.6

870

805

887

840

4.3

5.1

6.8

1.0

47

12

10.8

7.2

7.5

872

810

889

845

4.4

5.0

7.3

1.1

48

12

10.8

7.1

7.4

873

812

890

842

4.5

5.4

6.8

0.7

49

12

10.8

7.1

7.3

865

884

880

890

4.5

5.5

6.6

0.7

50

12

10.8

6.8

7.2

866

886

881

892

4.7

5.6

6.6

0.8

51

12

10.8

6.7

7.3

868

890

883

896

4.7

5.5

6.5

0.8

52

12

10.8

6.6

7.1

872

892

892

895

4.7

5.5

6.5

1.1

53

12

10.8

6.5

7.1

875

895

890

804

4.7

5.7

6.5

0.9

54

12

10.8

6.6

7.3

870

890

898

805

5.3

5.8

6.8

0.9

Note: Inf: Influent; Eff: Effluent 20 L CSF reactor made up of aluminium contains media typically partially weathered Deccan trap basalt, under drain and distributor for the wastewater. The influent and effluent samples were analysed at regular interval.